You caress your father's scrotum as you begin to think aloud about the proposal you just received.

You said IF you would have a daughter.

She would have deprived dad of a testicle.

So if it was decided before knowing about my twin birth, a potential sister of mine would have the right to destroy the other testicle and make him a eunuch.

Meanwhile, caress the parent's penis and testicles.

Since there is logic in what you say, they both nod at what you propose.

You start to smile in amusement.

With a sister I would have completely emptied dad's scrotum, leaving you without a toy.

You were ready for this.

You start referring solely to the mother as if the father's opinion is irrelevant.

Giving birth to twins you would be without any balls to play with. The fact that I have a brother should not be influential in the fate of the scrotum at stake. It makes me the sole owner of the rights to it.

2 daughters without balls. castrated husband. no ball to play with.(really happy mom)

Son with balls and daughter without. The son's balls would remain. Why shouldn't the mother give her daughter both of her husband's testicles if they are replaced by daughter ones with which the mother can continue to have fun. . . and also the daughter?